Soil classification
Texture by the USDA triangle and soil type by the World Reference Base — two independent characteristics used in different ways.
Quantities
| Symbol | Quantity | Unit |
|---|---|---|
— | sand, silt and clay fractions | % by mass |
— | texture class | one of 12 |
— | WRB reference soil group | one of 32 |
— | probability of a WRB group from the soil map | % |
Formulas
Particle-size limits (Soil Survey Manual)
sand 0.05…2.0 mm; silt 0.002…0.05 mm; clay < 0.002 mm
USDA triangle classes (Soil Survey Manual)
sand: S > 85 and Si + 1.5·C < 15
loamy sand: 70 ≤ S ≤ 90, Si + 1.5·C ≥ 15, Si + 2·C < 30
sandy loam: (7 ≤ C < 20, S > 52, Si + 2·C ≥ 30) or
(C < 7, Si < 50, Si + 2·C ≥ 30)
loam: 7 ≤ C < 27, 28 ≤ Si < 50, S ≤ 52
silt loam: (Si ≥ 50 and 12 ≤ C < 27) or (50 ≤ Si < 80 and C < 12)
silt: Si ≥ 80 and C < 12
sandy clay loam: 20 ≤ C < 35, Si < 28, S > 45
clay loam: 27 ≤ C < 40, 20 < S ≤ 45
silty clay loam: 27 ≤ C < 40, S ≤ 20
sandy clay: C ≥ 35 and S > 45
silty clay: C ≥ 40 and Si ≥ 40
clay: C ≥ 40, S ≤ 45, Si < 40S, Si, C are the sand, silt and clay fractions in per cent by mass. Strict and non-strict inequalities follow the source: one and the same line is shared between neighbouring classes. The twelve sets form a partition, verified over all 5151 integer triples summing to 100 %.
Texture
The class follows from the position of the point (sand, silt, clay) in the USDA triangle; there are twelve classes. This characteristic enters the water balance (FAO-56 table 19, whose heading names the USDA classification explicitly) and the lime requirement.
Soil type
The World Reference Base for Soil Resources distinguishes 32 reference soil groups by diagnostic horizons and properties. Chernozems are defined by a thick dark humus horizon, high base saturation and secondary carbonates lower in the profile. Soil type and texture are independent: a Chernozem is usually a loam or a clay by texture.
Estimating texture from coordinates
The class can be suggested from the SoilGrids 2.0 soil map (ISRIC): global maps at 250 m resolution produced by quantile regression forests. Means and the bounds of the 90 % prediction interval are shown for the 0–5 and 5–15 cm layers; the class is derived from the means alone, because only they are scaled to a hundred per cent, whereas the fraction medians are estimated independently and do not sum to a hundred. Layers are not averaged. The estimate is never written automatically: it is placed into the field by the user's action, and the same confirmation saves it as saves a manually chosen value.
The WRB answer
The map classifies in the WRB 2006 legend, while the app lists the groups of the 2022 edition. The lists agree on 31 names out of 32: the third edition replaced Albeluvisols with Retisols, and the fourth kept the groups unchanged. Groups with a matching name are offered, as is Albeluvisols in the form of Retisols; for other names the reason for having no substitution is given.
Use of the soil type
The soil type is recorded and accompanied by its WRB definition. It enters a quantitative calculation in one case: for Histosols (organic soils) and Calcisols (soils with secondary calcium carbonate accumulation) the lime dose is not taken from the table. For the former it is derived from hydrolytic acidity; for the latter carbonate saturation has already been reached.
Applicability and limitations
- The texture class is supplied by the user; laboratory particle-size analysis is not assumed.
- The authors of the soil map state that its predictions are not meant for use at a detailed, that is local, scale.
- The maps are built without built-up areas, water bodies and glaciers; urban and subaqueous soils are outside the model, and points within built-up areas carry no values.
- Model efficiency coefficients in cross-validation: clay 0.57, sand 0.66, silt 0.63, pH 0.70.
- The width of the 90 % prediction interval differs by an order of magnitude between locations and between fractions, and in some cases spans nearly the whole scale.
- A matching group name across two WRB editions does not mean a matching definition.
- The soil correction factors in the fertilizer estimate have no published source and are given as the project's own estimate.
- Of the 32 WRB groups, 14 that occur on garden plots are offered for selection.
Sources
- Soil Science Division Staff, USDA, 2017. Soil Survey Manual. USDA Agriculture Handbook 18 — full text open Open
- IUSS Working Group WRB, 2022. World Reference Base for Soil Resources. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. 4th edition. International Union of Soil Sciences, Vienna — full text open Open
- Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D. & Smith, M., 1998. Crop evapotranspiration — Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56 — full text open Open
- Poggio, L., de Sousa, L. M., Batjes, N. H., Heuvelink, G. B. M., Kempen, B., Ribeiro, E., Rossiter, D., 2021. SoilGrids 2.0: producing soil information for the globe with quantified spatial uncertainty. SOIL 7: 217–240; разрешение, квантильные леса, исключение застройки и вод, оценки MEC — full text open Open
- ISRIC — World Soil Information. SoilGrids — global gridded soil information. Данные под лицензией CC BY 4.0; оценка пригодности для конкретной задачи — ответственность пользователя — full text open Open
- Schad, P., 2023. World Reference Base for Soil Resources — its fourth edition and its history. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 186: 151–163; третье издание заменяет Albeluvisols на Retisols — full text open Open