Treatments: pre-harvest interval, repetition and hazard to bees
Quantities arriving with a row of the plant protection register, and the three statements that follow from them.
Quantities
| Symbol | Quantity | Unit |
|---|---|---|
— | pre-harvest interval | days |
— | interval between treatments | days, a range |
— | number of treatments per season | count |
— | hazard class for bees | I…IV |
— | flowering window of the crop | months; number of annotated records |
v | steady wind speed at 10 m | m/s |
Formulas
Date from which harvest is permitted
max over treatments (treatment date + pre-harvest interval)
Of several treatments, the one whose interval ends latest is taken.
Window for a repeat treatment
[last date + interval_min, last date + interval_max]
A window rather than a date. It closes once the number of treatments in the season reaches the count stated in the register.
Condition for the bee hazard warning
bee hazard class ≤ II and the current month falls within the flowering window of at least one crop on the bed
Condition for the weather warning
v > 5 m/s or T > 25 °C or humidity < 30 %, in each of the next 3 hours
The thresholds are given by the source. The requirement that the condition holds throughout the window is the application's: the source calls the values steady without naming a period, and a single hour above the threshold is a gust.
A snapshot rather than a reference
A journal entry stores the product name and the pre-harvest interval as values rather than as a reference to a register row. The catalogue is re-crawled in full and a row identifier lives until the next crawl; furthermore, a change in the register must not retroactively move the date before which the crop is not picked.
Repeat interval
The register states the number of treatments as a figure and the interval in prose within the application method ("at an interval of 7–10 days"). Parsing is performed on the server during the crawl; two numbers reach the device. An interval qualified by a temperature condition is not taken, as the application cannot check the condition. An interval was found for 252 rows of 989.
Hazard to bees
The hazard class field in the Ministry of Agriculture catalogue is a pair separated by a backslash: hazard to humans on the left, to bees on the right. The right half is in the first class for 255 rows of 989 and is the only place in the catalogue that says anything about bees. A warning is issued when two conditions coincide: the bee hazard class is first or second, and the current month falls within the flowering window of at least one crop on the bed. The window comes from a summary of annotated iNaturalist records, in which no season is stated below fifty records.
Form of the warning
Recording the treatment is not blocked. The register prints bee-flight restrictions and buffer distances beside the class, but those fields are absent from the open data; a prohibition without them would assert more than the source states.
Weather at the hour of treatment
The official “Grundsätze für die Durchführung der guten fachlichen Praxis im Pflanzenschutz” (Bundesanzeiger No. 76a of 21 May 2010, p. 54) state that spraying at steady wind speeds above 5 m/s, steady temperatures above 25 °C or relative humidity below 30 % is to be avoided: it leads to considerable loss of product to drift and evaporation. The wording of the source is reproduced — advice, not a prohibition; recording the treatment is not blocked. Mean wind speed is used rather than gusts. The document describes practice in Germany.
Russian requirements on wind
SanPiN 1.2.2584-10, which contained a requirement for ground application, ceased to have effect on 1 March 2021. The SanPiN 2.1.3684-21 now in force (section XII) gives a wind speed of no more than 4 m/s for aerial treatments (item 283); it holds no requirement for ground spraying in a garden. That figure is therefore not used by the application.
Applicability and limitations
- The flowering window is derived from records across the northern hemisphere and is a summary of how records are distributed over months, not a phenological date for a particular plot.
- Doses are shown only for rows registered for household use: for the rest the rate is given in units of industrial equipment.
- The seasonal count is tracked by product name, as the register defines it — for a product–crop pair.
- The German BVL register is listed separately: an approval does not cross a border.
- The conditions for carrying out a treatment come from a document describing practice in Germany; no equivalent exists in the Russian rules currently in force.
- The next 3 forecast hours are checked; the window of steadiness was chosen by the application, as the source names no period.
- Under cover the conditions are not checked: there is no wind there, and forecast temperature and humidity refer to the open air.
Sources
- Минсельхоз России. Государственный каталог пестицидов и агрохимикатов, разрешённых к применению на территории Российской Федерации. Открытые данные Минсельхоза России, набор 7708075454-pestitsidy — full text open Open
- iNaturalist. Phenology annotations of research-grade observations. iNaturalist, California Academy of Sciences and National Geographic Society — full text open Open
- Bundesministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz, 2010. Gute fachliche Praxis im Pflanzenschutz. Grundsätze für die Durchführung. Bekanntmachung im Bundesanzeiger Nr. 76a vom 21. Mai 2010; условия проведения опрыскивания — с. 54 — full text open Open